I Have Never Experienced Discrimination - 808 Words

I have never experienced discrimination on a really serious level before. I always try to hang out with good, positive people, that way I do not end up in situations where people are being hateful. In the eighth grade I experienced discrimination for the first time when my friends Alivia, Valerie, and I wanted to join the basketball team. There were only boys on the team so when they saw that we wanted to join them they were not too thrilled. The guys on the team made us feel insecure about playing just because of our gender. It was around two o’clock in the afternoon, and seventh period was beginning. Alivia, Valerie, and I joined the basketball elective; however, little did we know, we were the only girls in the class. There†¦show more content†¦I was not at all surprised. â€Å"Kyle,† James said. As soon as the words left his mouth, he grabbed a ball and the two teams started setting up. They completely ignored us and started the game. When Valerie went on t he court to protest, Noah yelled, â€Å"Get off the court! Interference! You’re in the way! Gosh girls are so dumb.† Our teacher did nothing to help us. He just refereed the game. â€Å"Hey, coach. They didn’t put us on teams,† I said trying to get him to acknowledge that there is a problem. â€Å"Sorry they’re already playing. Yeah! Nice shot Ryan!† He responded, barely paying attention. â€Å"But that isn’t fair we should get to play too.† He looked at me blankly for a few seconds, then turned away and spoke, â€Å"You can go to the small court and play with the sixth graders. Way to rebound James! Good Job!† This was my breaking point. I ran onto the court and stole the ball. â€Å"Hey! What’re you doing?† Noah said. â€Å"We want to play and you guys didn’t put us on your teams,† I said angrily. â€Å"Well that wouldn’t have been fair, you’re girls. You’re not as good as we are.† All I could think was, are they really that ignorant? I already knew the answer. My discriminatory incident relates to how Aunt Alexandra acts about Scout being un- lady-like in the novel To Kill a Mockingbird. Scout has been raised with two male figures in the house, so not being interested in â€Å"lady-likeness† is completely rational.

Conservatism (Politics) - Definition

Definition: Political conservatism in the United States is both an intellectual/theoretical tradition and a popular political movement.As an intellectual tradition, political conservatism does not necessarily focus on any particular political position or issue. In fact, most conservative traditionalists disagree with one another over a number of issues including (but not limited to) abortion, stem cell research, capital punishment, the environment and war. Nevertheless, these intellectual traditionalists tend to subscribe to the same conservative principles, those being primarily the importance of family, but also a small or limited government, a strong national defense and free enterprise.As a popular political movement, conservatism is more specific regarding a host of specific political issues that include (among other things) the pro-life movement, judicial restraint, welfare reform, immigration reform and the sanctity of marriage (specifically the opposition to gay marriage).Conservatism is also an umbrella term that embodies several different types of politically conservative philosophies. These are often primarily identified as neoconservatism, paleoconservatism and social conservatism, but they also include fiscal conservatism, cultural conseratism and crunchy conservatism. Pronunciation: kunservitizim Also Known As: moderation, orthodoxy, preservation, prudence, right-wing, reactionary, temperance, traditionalism, utilitarianism Alternate Spellings: conservativeness Examples: Former President Ronald Reagan: The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom, and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.†Author Craig Bruce: Liberalism is financed by the dividends from Conservatism.Actor Robert Redford: â€Å"Because, you know, youre in Utah. And because of its political conservatism, if you can make it there, you can make it anywhere.†

The Causes And Outcomes Of The French And Indian War

Contrast and Compare the Causes and Outcomes of the French and Indian War, the American Revolution, and the War of 1812. The wars prior to the Civil War may have taken place at different times throughout our history, they all feed into to one another like a river feeds a lake and a lake feeds into a river. It may have not seemed like it in the beginning but each one had a lasting effect and direct connection to the events of the future wars. All the wars prior to the Civil War had a direct purpose to building one of the Greatest Nations that still stands today. But each war led to another which could be directly link to the previous war. The French and Indian Wars were a series of conflicts between Spanish, Dutch, Britain, the thirteen colonies and Native American allies against France, its colonies in Canada, and its Native American allies. The wars took place from 1689-1763. The United States was not involved in the war until 1754-1763. The major cause of these conflicts was the need for other countries to control the territories of the North American, mainly the area around the Hudson Bay. The Hudson Bay area was essential to the fur trade. Whoever controlled that area would dominate the fur trade in North America. The French and Indian war could have been lost in the colonies but the military advantage shifted to Great Britain as a result of a bigger population and productivity compared to the French colonies. Also the British had a better ability to resupply theShow MoreRelatedThe American Colonies Military Struggles with European Nations687 Words   |  3 PagesThe causes and outcomes of the French and I ndian War, the American Revolution, and the War of 1812 are all significant links in the chronological chain of history that has led us to the creation of the United States of America. If any of these linked events were not to have occurred or had a different outcome, the United States very well would not exist or would still be a group of European colonies. Lasting from 1756 until 1763, The French and Indian War was mainly a proxy war fought between theRead MoreMajor Turning Points in U.S. History (1492-1820)1366 Words   |  6 Pagesof progress. Whether these pivotal moments in history may be triggered due to a single nonconforming individual or a vast, radical multitude, each turning point has explicit influences and outcomes which shaped America for years to follow. Every important decision has two key dimensions. The first is the outcome in the immediate case, and the second is as a precedent for future development. When calculating the most substantial turning points of something as expansive as an entire country one mustRead MoreFrench Revolution vs American Revolution1534 Words   |  7 PagesEssay French and American Revolution Both the American and French revolutions were focused on liberty and equality. America was trying to gain freedom from the rules, unfair taxation, War debt, and lack of representation from the British. The French Revolution on the other hand wanted to abolish the French monarchy and create a better government in which people could have more of a say in society, and also had similar causes as the American Revolution. They were similar in their causes becauseRead MoreWhere is The Peace in The Treaty of 1763? Essay example851 Words   |  4 Pagesof Indians received similar violence and unjust actions but in diverse ways. Native Americans experienced so much change because of the Treaty of Paris. They lost their land, their dependency was cut off (who they was receiving goods and gifts from), being subject to multiple laws of society (including proclamations and treaties) and tribes turning against each other. Also they struggle keeping their land from the Europeans but even immigrants as well. The Chief of a tribes would lead Indians toRead MoreRights: Procured through Independence Essay721 Words   |  3 Pageseasily. A paragon of this could be seen in the cause of the American Revolution, where the British imposed several acts of maltreatment upon the colonists, who had already won their independence. These acts limited the colonists’ lives, forcing them to abide by Britain’s every order and sacrifice their goods and imports for their mother country’s sake. Confining the lives of the colonists unfairly, major acts and events such as the French and Indian War, Intolerable Acts and Boston Tea Party were leadingRead MoreGeorge B. Seitz The Last Of The Mohicans Essay1396 Words   |  6 Pagesfrom 1936 that portrays the British heroes and the American colonial allies fighting the French with their Indian Allies. George II and William Pitt send Major Duncan Heyward to r einforce Colonel Munro. Munro and his British army and the American colonials march north to occupy Fort William Henry. The British camp has a traitor in their midst named Magua who is a Huron Indian (Hurons are allies of the French) He gathers intel and tries to capture Munro’s daughter Cora several times throughout theRead MoreA Union Of A Warehouse Producing Work867 Words   |  4 Pagesreplenish funds lost during their war with France (Stamp Act 1997). I can see this going into place because just like today the government spends our tax money on wars and were left with so much debt afterwards how is it going to be paid off, oh yeah the citizens! As the settlers are building an empire for the government, the government is becoming more powerful and rich. There are now situations that are leading to a fight and break away from the British Government and many wars are to be fought. As thisRead MoreColonial Indian Relations And The Impact On Colonization1479 Words   |  6 PagesCOLONIAL-INDIAN RELATIONS AND THE IMPACT ON COLONIZATION Jacquelyn Henry University of Texas at Arlington HIST 1311-701: History of the United States to 1865 September 6, 2016 When discussing colonization, it is often asserted that European settlers contributed a variety of foreign changes, both negative and positive, to the local natives. Things such as plants, domesticated animals, advances in weaponry, European fashion, religion and foreign disease were just a few of the new conceptsRead MoreThe War Of The American Revolution1207 Words   |  5 Pages No conflict in American history is as well-known then the American Revolutionary war. War between the colonies and Great Britain began in April of 1775 and, in a years’ time, the conflict will grow into one of the most arduous wars ever fought. After eight years of a hard-fought war, the colonists eventually won their independence over the British. Rooted in the conflict are countless causes and events that ultimately shaped the country into how it is today. The American Revolution also influencedRead MoreEssay about How did King George III lose his 13 American Colonies?1038 Words   |  5 Pag essole cause of the American Revolutionary War was the taxes imposed on the colonies by Britain. If a closer look is taken at the history of the Americas, however, it is easy to see that idea of freedom had been pulsing through the colonies for years. Just how did His Majesty King George III lose his American colonies? The answer is a chain of events stringing from the French and Indian war to the day George Washington handed over his troops to the Continental Congress, officially ending the War for

Dan Sperbers Article The Future of Writing - 1049 Words

In Dan Sperber’s article â€Å"The Future of Writing,† he assesses the presence of writing and reading in our society, as well as where it may lie in the future . He addresses the possible downfall of writing, the prevalence that reading will hold in our society, as well as how our society will adapt and handle the changes. He also covers the emergence of text-to-speech and speech-to-text technological advances, the effects on society and how the disappearance of the two of them will never fully occur. Sperber’s main claim throughout the article is that writing, with the help of technology, may eventually cease to exist, or at least be far less prominent . While writing has obtained a unique and prominent standing in most places of the†¦show more content†¦However, Sperber does stress that there is a strong difference between the writing and reading, and their relationship with technology. While he states that writing may completely be taken over by technology, the same could never be done to reading. Most particularly because the two are very closely linked, yet writing could never exist without reading. The benefits that are present with writing come mostly from reading, as well as with the fact that as you write, you read along with your words. Though writing may be replaced at some point in time, reading can never be replaced despite the text-to-speech technology. In particular, he addresses the impact that technology could have, and like writing it involves both speech and text, yet in the opposite order. This time technology would allow a person to listen to the text be read to them rather than having to read it themselves. However, Sperber suspects that this is much less likely than the latter, particularly because most people prefer to read and interpret on their own. They typically also do not enjoy the voice of the computer, and it is much harder to follow, especially due to

Assignment 055 Task a Free Essays

Assignment 55(NOTES, need to write up) Task a DUTY OF CARE AND SAFEGUARDING  ·1) duty of care is to keep children and young people safe and to protect them from sexual, physical and emotional harm. Children have a right to be safe and to be treated with respect and dignity. We as adults must take reasonable steps to ensure the safety and well being of pupils. We will write a custom essay sample on Assignment 055 Task a or any similar topic only for you Order Now Failure to do this could be regarded as professional neglect. Always act and be seen to act in the child’s best interests. 2) Duty of care safeguards children by the setting having done risk assessments and precautions taken to avoid accidents or the spreading of infections. Follow the correct procedures if you have any concerns for the child’s well being, set clear boundaries for children depending on age, stage and development and discourage any behaviour, which could result in a child being harmed or upset. Assessments and observations on children can alert you to any problems that may need addressing and the discussions with parents and other professionals. Always listen to what children have to say and take any concerns they may have seriously. 1) Duty of Care includes the concepts: †¢ to keep individuals safe †¢ to keep individuals free from harm †¢ to give choice Duty of care is a key concept in working with other human beings. It is a legal term for safeguarding self and others. Children and young people are often vulnerable as they are yet to develop the physical and cognitive capacity to fully care for themselves; they need care and protection from the adults around them. Health and social care organisations have what is called a duty of care towards the people they look after. That means that they must do everything they can to keep the people in their care safe from harm. ‘Duty of care’ means a requirement to exercise a ‘reasonable’ degree of attention and caution to avoid negligence which would lead to harm to other people. Working with children and young people brings a significant duty of care and we need to recognise that the younger and more vulnerable the child the greater the duty of care. Your vigilance and attention keeps children and young people safe as they develop: †¢ the ability to foresee and cope with potential dangers †¢ more robust immune systems †¢ empathy –understanding their actions may hurt or upset others †¢ communication skills to be able to talk about harm others may be doing to them 2) duty of care is a requirement to excercise a reasonable degree of attention and caution to avoid negligence which would lead to harm to others. your vigilance and attention keeps young children safe as they develop How to cite Assignment 055 Task a, Essay examples

Oppressed Slaves To Champion Soldiers Essay Example For Students

Oppressed Slaves To Champion Soldiers Essay Oppressed Slaves to Champion SoldiersThis is just a small example of the doubt and hatred that was bestowed on the African American soldiers. However, during the war, they proved themselves to be brave and courageous men on and off the battlefield on many occasions. Despite deep prejudices and harsh criticisms from the white society, these men were true champions of patriotism. The cause of the Civil War was tension between the North and the South. The sectional division between the areas began in colonial times, largely resulting from geographical differences. The South was ideal for growing tobacco due to the warm climate and the fertile soil. Plantations brought in black slaves from Africa to provide most of the labor required for growing the crop. In time, other plantation crops such as cotton, sugar cane, indigo, and sugar beets were to thrive in the South. By the onset of the Civil War, 2.4 million slaves were engaged in cotton production (Long 16). A rural way of life that supported an agrian economy based on slave labor was quickly established in the South. The North, however, was a cooler, rockier climate that would not support the development of plantations. As a result, the Norths economy came to depend more on trade and industry than on agriculture. This economy supported the growth of cities, although many lived in rural areas during the coloni al period. The sectional division between North and South had widened enormously by the mid 1800s. The United States had expanded all the way to the Pacific Ocean and was rapidly becoming a major industrial and commercial nation. However, industry and commerce were centered in the North. The Northerners welcomed modernization and the constant changes it brought to their way of life. Their ideals included hard work, education, economic independence, and the belief that the community had the right and responsibility to decide whether an action was moral or immoral. While Northerners looked forward to a different and better future, Southerners held the present and past dear. They enjoyed a prosperous agricultural economy based on slave labor and wished to keep their old way of life. By the 1800s, northerners viewed slavery as wrong and began a movement to end it. Even though an antislavery minority existed in the South, most Southerners found slavery to be highly profitable and in time came to consider it a positive good. Such situations as the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act raised tensions between the North and the South. The Compromise of 1850 was a group of acts passed by Congress in the hope of settling the dreaded slavery question by satisfing both the North and South. The Compromise allowed slavery to continue where it desired, but the trading of slaves was prohibited in Washington DC. New territories would have the choice to decide whether to permit slavery or not. This act also required that the North return escaped slaves to their owners. The Kansas-Nebraska Act dealt with the problem of Slavery in new territories. This Act allowed slavery in Nebraska and Kansas. It also provided that when the people of each territory o! rganized as a st ate, they could decide by popular vote whether to permit slavery to continue. The Dred Scott Decision, where a slave claimed freedom because he had lived in a free state and territory for some time, was denied his freedom. The Supreme Court declared that no black could be a US citizen. The ruling aroused anger in the North and showed that the conflict over slavery was beyond judicial solutions. Another situation was the raid at Harpers Ferry. An abolitionist named John Brown and his followers attempted to start a slave rebellion by seizing the federal arsenal in Harpers Ferry, Va. Brown, however, was captured 28 hours later by troops under the command of Colonel Robert E. Lee. Brown was convicted of treason and hanged two weeks later. Many Southerners saw the raid as evidence of a Northern plot to end slavery by force. During the election of 1860, Lincoln was chosen by the Republicans as their party candidate. The Democrats chose Douglas for their ticket. Lincoln won all electoral v otes of every free state except New Jersey, which awarded him four of its seven votes. He thus gained a majority of electoral votes and won the election. However, Lincoln received less than 40 per cent of the popular vote, almost none of which came from the South. Southerners feared Lincoln would restrict or end slavery. Before the 1860 presidential election, Southern leaders had urged that the South secede from the Union if Lincoln should win. Many Southerners favored secession as part of the idea that the states have rights and powers which the federal government cannot legally deny. The supporters of states rights held that the national government was a league of independent states, any of which had the right to secede. In December 1860, South Carolina became the first state to secede. Five other states Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, and Louisiana followed in January 1861. In February, representatives from the six states met in Montgomery, Ala., and established the Confederate States of America. They elected Jefferson Davis of Mississippi as president and Alexander H. Stephens of Georgia as vice president. In March, Texas joined the confederacy. Lincoln was inaugurated two days later. In his inaugural address, Lincoln avoided any threat of immediate force against the South. But he stated that the Union would last forever and that he would use the nations full power to hold federal possessions in the South. One of the possessions, the military post of Fort Sumter, lay in the harbor of Charleston, SC. The Confederates fired on the fort on April 12 and forced its surrender the next day. Following the firing on Fort Sumter, Fredrick Douglass wrote a fiery editorial Nemesis:At last our proud Republic is overtaken. Our National Sin has found us out. The National Head is bowed down, and our face is mantled with shame and confusion. No foreign arm is made bare for our chastisement. No distant monarch, offended at our freedom and prosperity, has plotted our destruction no envious tyrant has prepared for our necks his oppressive yoke. Slavery has done it all. Our enemies are those of our own household. It is civil war, the worst of all wars, that has unveiled its savage and wrinkled front among us. During the last twenty years and more, we have as a nation been forging a bolt for our own national destruction, collecting and augmenting the fuel that now threatens to wrap the nation in its malignant and furious flames. We have sown the wind, only to reap the whirlwind. Against argument, against all manner of appeal and remonstrances coming up from the warm and merciful heart of humanity, we have gone on like the oppressors of Egypt, hardenin! g our hearts and increasing the burdens of the American slave, and strengthening the arm of his guilty master, till now, in the pride of his giant power, that master is emboldened to lift rebellious arms against the very majesty of the law, and defy the power of the Government itself. In vain have we plunged our souls into new and unfathomed depths of sin, to conciliate the favor and secure the loyalty of the slave holding class. We have hated and persecuted the Negro we have scourged him out of the temple of just ice by the Dred Scott decision we have shot and hanged his friends at Harpers Ferry we have enacted laws for his further degradation, and even to expel him from the borders of some of our States we have joined in the infernal chase to hunt him down like a beast, and fling him into the hell of slavery we have repealed and trampled upon laws designed to prevent the spread of slavery and in a thousand ways given to increase the power and ascendancy of slavery ! over all departments of Government and now, as our reward, this slave-holding power comes with sword, gun, and cannon to take the life of the nation and overthrow the great American Government (Long 26). There is no more moving and telling an expression of the Blacks view of the Civil War than this (Long 26). trail of tears EssayThe decision to use the blacks as soldiers was by no means universally popular and was also selfishly motivated. The decision to use the Negro as a soldier did not necessarily grow out of any broad humanitarian resolve it seems to have come more largely out of the dawning realization that, since the Confederates were going to kill a great many more Union soldiers before the war was over, a good many white men would escape death if a considerable percentage of those soldiers were colored. (Leckie 4). Blacks sought refuge behind the Union lines in greater and greater numbers throughout the war (Long 26). So why would blacks still want to fight for the country that did not want them, but needed them to fight? Runaway slaves from the South joined the Union army for two reasons: They wanted to protect themselves and escape the grasp of the South, and they wanted to fight the evils of slavery. Frederick Douglas encouraged blacks to join the Union cause. The first blac k regiment to be formed was the 1st Kansas Colored Volunteers in October, 1862. There were doubts against this group from their very beginning. In general, white soldiers and officers believed that black men lacked the courage to fight and fight well. In October, 1862, African-American soldiers of the 1st Kansas Colored Volunteers silenced their critics by repulsing attacking Confederates at the battle of Island Mound, Missouri. (Park Net 1) At the battle of Port Hudson, Louisiana, May 27, 1863, the African-American soldiers bravely advanced over open ground in the face of deadly artillery fire. Although the attack failed, the black soldiers proved their capability to withstand the heat of battle. On July 17, 1863, at Honey Springs, Indian Territory, now Oklahoma, the 1st Kansas Colored fought with courage once again. Union troops under General James Blunt ran into a strong Confederate force under General Douglas Cooper. After a two-hour bloody engagement, Coopers soldiers retreated. The 1st Kansas, which had held the center of the Union line, advanced to within fifty paces of the Confederate line and exchanged fire for some twenty minutes until the Confederates broke and ran. General Blunt wrote after the battle, I never saw such fighting as was done by the Negro regiment. The question if Negroes will fight is settled besides they make better soldiers in every respect than any other troops I have ever had under my command. After this battle, black soldiers began to receive some respect. (Park Net 1). Even though the 1st Kansas regiment and other colored groups were beginning to win many battles, discrimination in pay and other areas remained widespread. According to the Milit ia Act of 1862, soldiers of African descent were to receive $10.00 a month, plus a clothing allowance of $3.50. Many regiments struggled for equal pay, some refusing any money. However, Congress granted equal pay for all black soldiers in June of 1864. The most famous black regiment would have to be the 54th Massachusetts. On February 16, 1863, a call for black soldiers was published in the columns of the Boston Journal. In five days, twenty-five men were secured. Much of the larger number of recruits were obtained through black organizations in the Boston area. This regiment was to be lead by Colonel Robert Shaw. This regiment has gained great popularity over the last decade with the release of the Oscar-winning film Glory. The most widely known battle fought by African-Americans was the assault on Fort Wagner, South Carolina, by the 54th Massachusetts on July 18, 1863. The 54th volunteered to lead the assault on the strongly-fortified Confederate positions. It was a suicide mission from the start. But if the black soldiers had any success in the attack, all doubts would be lifted for they would have defeated all odds. To this Massachusetts Fifty-fourth was set the stupendous task to convince the white race that colored troops would fight, and not only would they fight, but that they could be made, in every sense of the word, soldiers (Emilio 17). Your success hangs on the general success. If the Union lives, it will live with equal races. If divided, and you have done your duty, then you will stand upon the same platform with the white race. Then make use of the offers Government has made you for if you are not willing to fight your way up to office, you are not worthy of it. Put yourselves under the starts and stripes, and fight yourselves to the marquee of a general, and you shall come out with a sword! (Emilio 14). The soldiers of the 54th scaled the forts parapet, and were only driven back after brutal hand-to-hand combat. A monument of the 54th and its slain leader Colonel Robert Shaw was installed in Boston May 31st, 1897. Black soldiers participated in every major campaign of 1864-1865 except Shermans invasion of Georgia. The year 1864 was especially eventful for black troops. On April 12, 1864, at Fort Pillow, Tennessee, Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest led his 2,500 men against the Union-held fortification, occupied by 292 black and 285 white soldiers. After driving the Union pickets and giving the garrison an opportunity to surrender, Forrests men swarmed into the fort with little difficulty and drove the Federals down the rivers bluff into a deadly crossfire. Casualties were high and only sixty-two of the US Color Troops survived the fight. Many accused the Confederates of perpetuating a massacre of black troops, and the controversy continues to this day. The battle cry for the Negro soldier east of the Mississippi River became Remember Fort Pillow!' (Park Net 5). The Confederate army did not consider the usage of slaves throughout the war. However, near the end when the future looked dismal, the South decided to use blacks for the Confederate cause. Leaders of the Confederacy considered schemes for the enlistment of blacks in the armies and for their eventual freedom (Long 26). However, those who did serve in the Confederate army were not given their freedom by the Confederate government, but rather by the North after the war had ended. The United States Civil War began as an effort to save the Union, and ended in a fight to abolish slavery. This battle for emancipation, some would argue, was won by the slaves themselves. While this remains a debate, it is clear that the slaves did contribute significantly to their own freedom. By running from masters to become contrabands for the Union, laboring behind the scenes for the Northern armies, and risking their lives on the battlefront, the slaves centralized the issue of freedom and played a key role in the Norths victory. (New York Public Library 1). In actual numbers, African-American soldiers comprised 10% of the entire Union Army. Losses among African-Americans were high, and from all reported casualties, approximately one-third of all African-Americans enrolled in the military lost their lives during the Civil war. (Park Net 5). African-American soldiers, despite doubt and prejudice by society, proved themselves to be formidable warriors on the battlefield. They were just as deadly, if not deadlier, that their white counterparts. They won many of the Civil War battles, and in doing so, won their independence. Once let the black man get upon his person the brass letters, US, let him get an eagle on his button, and a musket on his shoulder and bullets in his pockets, and there is no power on earth which can deny that he has earned the right to citizenship in the United States (Park Net 1).